Nietzsche philosophy in a nutshell
Nietzsche offered three criticism of Rousseau. His writing is often dramatic and poetic, and the reasoning is sometimes hidden behind the stylistic quirks. The ascetic ideal is necessary, as God was previously necessary, to teach and inspire humans in the way of our social ethic. The creature is dichotomy, seeing himself as superior and a master of his environment, but simultaneously he hates his human self, seeing his weaknesses and flaws. Russell famously imagines the Buddha and Nietzsche jointly advising God on how we should set up the world. The law is claimed as a given, even that it is not of human origin although it has actually evolved and lost its meaning; even though, at one time, everything in the law has been demonstrated through experience. Slave morality is the morality of duty and utilitarianism. While the French Revolution was the result of corruption by slave class. So nihilism takes over - there is nothing of real value left.
Perhaps understanding this logic marks a qualitative difference in the way existence is understood. How does this relate to Nietzsche's version of morality?
She dismisses this as irrelevant because even if he is right he is still unable to distinguish what voluntary action consists in.
He therefore does not see the will to power as good or bad - just a fact of life BGE Then the trickiest of all questions steps into the foreground: whether science is in a position to provide goals of behaviour.
Nietzsche, at the very least, is not concerned with divining origins. What he can say, as an expansion of the word "desirable," is this: "If men will read my works, a certain percentage of them will come to share my desires as regards the organization of society; these men, inspired by the energy and determination which my philosophy will give them, can preserve and restore aristocracy, with themselves as aristocrats.
Nietzsche will to power
In its widest sense, ethics comes from the Greek, ethikos, which in turn derives from ethos, meaning habit or custom. The misery of a whole nation, he says, is of less importance than the suffering of a great individual: "The misfortunes of all these small folk do not together constitute a sum-total, except in the feelings of mighty men. From within the logic of will to power, narrowly construed, human meaning is thus affirmed. These humans of slave morality are on their way to the middle and none of them will reach a new, evolved level of existence, if they continue striving for the mediocre of existence. He states ordinary herds as bunch of useless people,mediocre people from all directions are joining hands dominion of the inferior people to overcome the noble men or aristocrats and thus the noble men should be powerful and disciplined to control and maintain their power, this idea of his is called Master-Slave Morality. Walter Kaufmann put forward the view that the powerful individualism expressed in his writings would be disastrous if introduced to the public realm of politics. Since then I've had difficulty coming up with any of the tenderness and protectiveness I've so long felt toward you. Rules have grown from customs, are presented without reasons, and we absorb these rules, WS They define themselves as anti-masters. Political correctness and the rule of the expert becomes the norm. Nietzsche despised democracy and notion of 'equality of rights' and 'sympathy with sufferers' because he believed that this would be robbing the conditions that could make them great. Afraid to live by the strength of our own wills, we invent religion as a way of generating and then explaining our perpetual sense of being downtrodden and defeated in life. The law is claimed as a given, even that it is not of human origin although it has actually evolved and lost its meaning; even though, at one time, everything in the law has been demonstrated through experience. Is it always the case that the charity is a sham?
Will to Power The exemplar expresses hope not granted from metaphysical illusions. The Ubermensch and the Will to Power What is Nietzsche's solution to what he sees as this metaethical morass?
based on 108 review