Philosophy of sex
Sexual fantasy is a ubiquitous human phenomenon that suggests provocative questions: Does sexually fantasizing about a person "use" that person in any robust sense? We can thus see how each pleasure has its opposite: one can feel painful sensations during a sexual act e. So everything hinges on the criterion of serious risk to the agent. The Philosophy of Sex, 4th edition. A non-psychological account of sexual perversion, one closer to folk biology, claims that only reproduction allows us to distinguish perversions from non-perversions Ruddick ; cf. Equally problematic on this view is X objectifying him or herself—more accurately, allowing him or herself to be objectified by Y. A person who has vulgar eros is one who experiences promiscuous sexual desire, has a lust that can be satisfied by any partner, and selfishly seeks only for himself or herself the pleasures of sexual activity. Heterosexism: An Ethical Challenge. If you were on your toes, you would ask me, before answering, "What counts as a sexual partner? New York: Harper and Row, X wants to enjoy Y herself, not her beautiful voice, her massaging abilities, etc. This feature of orgasm might explain how we can speak of sexual desire across times and cultures as a unified phenomenon, even though sexual desires and bodily sensations are socially and linguistically mediated. Boston, Mass.
Note, in this example, one more difference between Aquinas and Nagel: Aquinas would judge the sexual activity of the fetishist to be immoral precisely because it is perverted it violates a natural pattern established by Godwhile Nagel would not conclude that it must be morally wrong—after all, a fetishistic sexual act might be carried out quite harmlessly—even if it does indicate that something is suspicious about the fetishist's psychology.
New York: McGraw-Hill,pp. The Philosophy of Erotic Love.
Another criterion is intention, though we need to figure out what the intention is for. The Hidden Crime. Bechhofer, eds, Acquaintance Rape.
Philosophy of sex
Lewis in his The Four Loves chapter 5 , and it is perhaps what Allan Bloom has in mind when he writes, "Animals have sex and human beings have eros, and no accurate science [or philosophy] is possible without making this distinction" Love and Friendship, p. Verene, Donald, ed. Of course, sexual partners normally observe limits on how they treat each other: they do not violate each other, treat each other literally as objects, and so on, exactly because they understand that they may not treat people in such ways. I was supposed to be rational and operate ethically while having my sexuality abused. One might object that this argument is paternalistic, telling people not to engage in sex when the sex is harmful Soble 37— Regardless, we must avoid the circularity of arguing that a species is the right model because these creatures are remarkably like humans—unless our methodology is a sophisticated "reflective equilibrium. But the derivative concept "virginity" and similar notions—abstinence, chastity, celibacy—require careful analysis in their own right. But the only thing that would seem to make the act a sexual perversion is that it does, on a fairly reliable basis, nonetheless produce sexual pleasure. The other's genitals, too, are the object of our attention: "sexuality is not an inclination which one human being has for another as such, but is an inclination for the sex of another.
Eros, Agape and Philia. Heidegger was a member of the Nazi partyand as a professor began an affair with his then student, Hannah Arendt.
Metaphysics of homosexuality
Thus, even if pursuing sexual pleasure is not as intellectually stimulating as reading classical Arabic poetry, it is not worthless, whether intellectually or non-intellectually, and it is on a par with many other pursuits that people undertake that are far from having intellectual depth. Held, Virginia. It was late nineteenth-century European sexology that detected value in picking out and labeling a class of persons as homosexual. Lectures on Ethics. In most activities, the pleasure and the activity are intertwined—we do not watch a movie and then feel the pleasure. And so, while online apps that facilitate easy hook ups may lead to more orgasms, they have a tendency to thwart real desire. Is adultery altogether a physical act or could desires and fantasies be not only adulterous in spirit but adultery itself? Translated by Louis Infield. The Hidden Crime. Jung, Patricia, and Ralph Smith. Gray
based on 109 review